sorry for not updating you at the end of december. haha talking to my lj, well i own it so why not. anyway to sum up for the december - feburary months it has gone like this. realizing that i need to do better, trying to fix things is difficult, and learning about new things is difficult to understand at times.
anyway i just wanted to post about the stuff i have read over the past couple days. all about god. my personal view is that you can have an extreme amount of faith, not a belief. now dont try and bash me, cause thats saying i recognize what you think, and i wont diss it. we all have our ways. so these arguments ive been reading, seems like they all argue the same thing. we are dependent beings, there should be things that are independent, so there is an independent being and that is god. i see the logic and i understand it. it does make sense logically (a priori), but not through experience, like i have seen god (a posteriori).
i've been really tired of reading the same thing. so i just wanted to say, do we really need to know where it comes from? do we need to see it to believe in it. the answer is no, we want to see it, but we dont need to. how can you diss someone's faith, its theirs and not yours. do what you want with it. my objection is also the same as others.
and while i didnt read that entire part, my conclusion is that we dont really need to know, to know. my view wont get me an A which sucks, needs more to it.
and also i think my bike is on its last breath, meaning it will break soon, cause the fucks at the bike shop fucked it up today. i dont want to walk to class! damn.